In a landmark moment for India's space ambitions, Indian astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla has blasted off to the International Space Station (ISS) as part of the Axiom-4 mission , marking the country's return to human spaceflight after a 41-year hiatus . This historic launch from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida has not only reignited national pride but also officially kickstarted India’s human spaceflight programme . The mission, operated by Axiom Space , includes a four-member international crew that will spend 14 days in orbit , conducting scientific research, outreach programs, and various commercial activities. This momentous occasion places India among a select group of nations capable of sending humans into space and reflects the growing prowess of the Indian space sector . A New Chapter: Shubhanshu Shukla and India’s Astronautical Comeback The last Indian to go to space was Rakesh Sharma in 1984, aboard the Soviet spacecraft Soyuz T-11. Now, in 2025, Shubhanshu...
In recent developments, Serbia’s government has faced accusations of deploying a sonic weapon against protesters. The alleged use of sound-based technology to disperse crowds has raised serious human rights and ethical concerns. While sonic weapons are not new to modern law enforcement, their controversial application in peaceful demonstrations has sparked global outrage.
What Are Sonic Weapons?
Sonic weapons, also known as acoustic or sound-based weapons, utilize high-frequency sound waves to cause discomfort, disorientation, or pain. These devices emit sound at decibel levels high enough to incapacitate individuals, often causing nausea, headaches, or even long-term hearing damage. The most commonly used sonic weapon is the Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD), which emits focused beams of sound to disperse crowds.
Why Are Sonic Weapons Controversial?
The primary controversy surrounding sonic weapons stems from their potential to inflict harm on human health. Unlike tear gas or rubber bullets, which have visible effects, sound waves can penetrate deeply into the human body, causing inner ear damage and psychological trauma. Human rights activists argue that using such technology against civilians constitutes a violation of fundamental rights.
The Serbian Protest Incident
The allegations against the Serbian government emerged after videos surfaced showing protesters experiencing severe discomfort, covering their ears, and appearing disoriented. Eyewitnesses reported hearing a piercing, high-pitched sound emanating from concealed devices mounted on police vehicles. Although authorities have not officially acknowledged the use of sonic weapons, mounting evidence and public outrage have intensified the controversy.
The Use of Sonic Weapons Globally
Sonic weapons have been employed in several countries for crowd control, particularly in the United States and China. In most cases, these devices are promoted as non-lethal alternatives to traditional riot control measures. However, medical experts have repeatedly cautioned against their indiscriminate use, highlighting the risk of permanent auditory damage and neurological effects.
How Do Sonic Weapons Work?
Sonic weapons operate by generating sound waves at frequencies beyond normal human tolerance. These high-decibel sounds can induce discomfort, dizziness, or even loss of consciousness. Depending on the model and configuration, sonic weapons can target specific areas or emit sound over broader spaces.
Effects on the Human Body:
Hearing Damage: Prolonged exposure can lead to permanent hearing loss.
Disorientation and Nausea: High-intensity sound waves disrupt the inner ear’s balance mechanisms.
Psychological Trauma: Continuous exposure may induce anxiety and stress disorders.
Physical Pain: The intensity can cause headaches and internal discomfort.
Public and International Reactions
The accusations have sparked international criticism, with human rights organizations calling for an immediate investigation. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have urged Serbia to clarify its stance and release information regarding crowd control tactics. Meanwhile, citizens continue to protest, demanding transparency and accountability from the government.
Legal and Ethical Implications
Using sonic weapons against peaceful protesters violates international human rights norms, including the right to peaceful assembly. Legal experts emphasize that indiscriminate use without clear regulation could lead to severe legal consequences for the responsible authorities.
The Future of Crowd Control Technology
As governments worldwide experiment with non-lethal methods to manage civil unrest, the debate over the ethical use of sonic weapons intensifies. Alternatives like water cannons or pepper spray, while controversial, do not pose the same risk of permanent harm as acoustic devices.
FAQs
Q1: What is a sonic weapon?
A1: A device that emits high-frequency sound waves to disperse crowds or incapacitate individuals.
Q2: How do sonic weapons affect the human body?
A2: They can cause hearing loss, disorientation, headaches, and psychological trauma.
Q3: Has Serbia confirmed using sonic weapons?
A3: No official confirmation has been made, but video evidence and eyewitness accounts suggest their use.
Q4: Are sonic weapons legal?
A4: Their legality varies by country, but using them against peaceful protesters raises human rights concerns.
Q5: How do other countries use sonic weapons?
A5: Countries like the USA and China have deployed them for crowd control, often sparking debate over their safety and ethics.
Conclusion
The alleged use of sonic weapons in Serbia has ignited a fierce debate on human rights and state accountability. While the technology offers a non-lethal means of crowd control, its potential to cause irreversible harm cannot be overlooked. As investigations continue, global attention remains focused on how Serbia addresses these serious allegations.