How Technology Shapes Global Power: Lessons for India

In today’s world, power is no longer defined solely by military might or economic clout. It is increasingly shaped by a country’s ability to harness, diffuse, and govern technology. In a recent essay, renowned public intellectual Pratap Bhanu Mehta offers a powerful insight into how technology reshapes the global balance of power — and why India needs to rethink its strategy if it wishes to emerge as a genuine technology leader.

Rather than obsessing over sectoral dominance — whether in artificial intelligence (AI), semiconductors, or quantum computing — Mehta argues that India should focus on fostering an ecosystem that enables the diffusion of General Purpose Technologies (GPTs). These are technologies that do not merely transform single industries but instead spark cascading changes across the entire economy and society.

The idea is both simple and radical: power in the 21st century is not about who owns a particular technology but about who enables its widespread and inclusive use.

Understanding the Power of General Purpose Technologies

To grasp Mehta’s argument, we must first understand what GPTs are. These are technologies that can be applied across a wide range of sectors and that fuel innovation far beyond their original domains. Classic examples from history include electricity and the internet. Today, modern GPTs include AI, blockchain, quantum computing, 5G/6G, semiconductors, renewable energy systems, and biotechnology.

What distinguishes GPTs is their ability to serve as infrastructure — foundations on which countless other innovations can be built. GPTs are not just tools; they are transformation platforms. Once embedded into the fabric of the economy, they generate exponential value by triggering new products, services, and even entire industries.

And herein lies the challenge for India: while much attention has been given to excelling in individual technologies — becoming a chip manufacturing hub or a global AI development center — the country has often neglected the more important task of enabling these technologies to penetrate every layer of its society and economy.

India’s Tech Landscape: Ambitious but Fragmented

India’s technology ambitions are expansive and, in many ways, admirable. Through initiatives like Digital India, Make in India, Atmanirbhar Bharat, and the Semicon India Programme, the government has shown a deep commitment to technological advancement. In recent years, India has also launched the National Quantum Mission and bolstered support for the startup ecosystem, making it the third-largest in the world.

Yet despite these efforts, India’s approach has often been piecemeal and overly focused on sectoral wins. This obsession with being number one in AI or semiconductors may yield symbolic victories but does little to ensure that technology becomes a lever of inclusive development or a source of systemic power.

The real question is not whether India can build one or two globally competitive sectors, but whether it can democratize the access to and benefits of General Purpose Technologies — in agriculture, education, health, logistics, and beyond.

Moving from Dominance to Diffusion

Mehta’s insight is a call for a strategic pivot: if India wants to shape the future balance of power, it must build mechanisms for the broad-based diffusion of GPTs, not just their elite capture.

Take, for example, India’s pioneering work in Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI). Aadhaar (digital identity), UPI (unified payments interface), and CoWIN (vaccination platform) have created a digital backbone that now enables millions to access services, make payments, and verify identity with unprecedented ease. These are examples of technology not as privilege, but as public good.

Extending this model to other GPTs is both possible and necessary. Building a National Health Stack, operationalizing the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC), and creating AI-driven EdTech platforms could ensure that every citizen, not just tech companies, benefits from the next generation of innovations.

This is how India can make technology sovereign — not by closing its doors to foreign platforms or building walls around its internet, but by designing systems that enable local, diverse, and creative uses of cutting-edge technologies.

R&D, Skilling, and Ecosystem Thinking

For this transformation to happen, India needs to significantly boost its capacity for foundational research and development. Currently, India spends just 0.65% of its GDP on R&D, lagging far behind countries like the United States, South Korea, or Israel. Without sustained investment in science and research, India cannot expect to lead or even meaningfully participate in the development of GPTs.

But beyond raw investment, the real challenge is institutional. Indian universities remain underfunded and poorly integrated with the tech ecosystem. Industry-academia linkages are weak. Government departments often work in silos. A more agile, cross-sectoral approach is required — one that promotes research parks, innovation clusters, and mission-driven public-private partnerships.

Equally vital is the need to address the skills gap. GPTs like AI and quantum computing require new ways of thinking and doing. India's education and skilling systems must be reoriented toward lifelong learning, interdisciplinary knowledge, and future-readiness. This is especially important if we want these technologies to reach beyond elite urban centers and benefit rural and semi-urban populations as well.

Democratizing Innovation

One of India's great strengths is its pluralistic, decentralized innovation culture. Unlike authoritarian states that centralize control over technology, India has the potential to unleash bottom-up innovation that is socially embedded and locally relevant.

But to make this happen, the government must move away from top-down approaches and invest in decentralized tech ecosystems. This means supporting local AI applications in regional languages, IoT-based farming tools, and telemedicine platforms for rural health workers. It means embracing frugal innovation alongside frontier science.

In short, innovation must be contextualized — not just copied from Silicon Valley or Shenzhen.

Strategic Autonomy and the Tech Power Game

The geopolitics of technology is heating up, and India finds itself navigating a volatile terrain. The US-China tech war, export controls on semiconductors, and debates on digital sovereignty have all highlighted the risks of overdependence on foreign tech ecosystems.

While India should not fall into the trap of techno-nationalism, it must build sufficient strategic autonomy in key areas like trusted hardware, cybersecurity, and AI governance. Developing dual-use technologies that serve both civilian and military purposes will be critical to safeguarding national interests.

Moreover, India needs to participate more actively in setting global tech standards. This is where GPTs become a geopolitical instrument — the nations that define the rules around data, AI ethics, and cross-border flows will be the ones shaping the future global order.

Toward a New Policy Mindset

If India is serious about becoming a global tech leader by 2030, it needs a new policy mindset — one that is mission-oriented, inclusive, and forward-looking. Technology policy should not be treated as a subset of industrial policy or national security; it must be seen as nation-building infrastructure.

This means crafting a coherent national strategy that cuts across ministries and sectors. It means treating public data as a strategic asset, not a liability. It means creating smart regulatory sandboxes for AI and biotech, encouraging experimentation while protecting public interest.

Above all, it means recognizing that the true measure of a technology superpower is not how many chips it produces or how many unicorns it has — but how effectively it turns breakthrough technologies into everyday tools for real people.

Final Thoughts

Pratap Bhanu Mehta’s reflections remind us that the politics of technology is not just about innovation, but about inclusion, institutions, and imagination. Power in the 21st century will not come from control, but from the capacity to empower others through the diffusion of General Purpose Technologies.

India has the talent, the ambition, and the democratic DNA to lead in this space. But to do so, it must stop chasing technological trophies and start building technological foundations. Only then can we ensure that the future of technology is not just Indian-made, but Indian-shaped.

MCQs 

1. What are General Purpose Technologies (GPTs)?
   Answer: Technologies with cross-sectoral impact.

2. Which of the following is an example of India’s Digital Public Infrastructure?
   Answer: Aadhaar.

3. According to Pratap Bhanu Mehta, technology leadership requires:
   Answer: Broad-based diffusion of technologies.

Trump's Policy Uncertainty Sends Biotech Sector into a Slump

In recent years, the biotech industry has emerged as a cornerstone of innovation, especially in areas like gene therapy, personalized medicine, and vaccine development. However, this dynamic and promising sector is highly sensitive to government regulations, policy frameworks, and economic signals. Under the Trump administration, the biotech sector witnessed a turbulent journey, driven by policy uncertainty, sudden regulatory shifts, and volatile rhetoric on healthcare pricing reforms.

This blog delves into how Trump’s policy ambiguity and decision-making style impacted the biotech industry, contributing to a market slump and investor hesitancy. It also analyzes the broader implications for pharmaceutical innovation, R&D funding, and global biotech partnerships.

Trump Administration and Policy Volatility

One of the defining features of Donald Trump’s presidency was his unconventional approach to governance. For sectors like biotech, which rely on predictable and science-driven regulatory environments, this approach often created confusion and instability.

Key Elements of Policy Uncertainty:

1. Drug Pricing Rhetoric: Repeated promises to “lower drug prices” led to widespread concern among pharmaceutical investors. Trump’s tweets alone were known to cause stock drops in major biotech firms.

2. Healthcare Reform Uncertainty: The push to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) created fears about the insurance coverage landscape, which could affect the demand for high-end biotech treatments.

3. Regulatory Inconsistencies: Mixed signals from the FDA under Trump's administration – sometimes fast-tracking approvals, sometimes introducing delays – added further unpredictability.

Impact on the Biotech Sector

The uncertainty induced by the Trump administration impacted the biotech sector across several dimensions:

1. Stock Market Performance

The NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (NBI) experienced fluctuations directly linked to Trump’s policy pronouncements. Investors pulled back from biotech stocks fearing price controls and regulatory overhauls.

2. Funding Slowdown

Venture capital funding in biotech startups showed signs of contraction as investors sought safer industries. This slowdown negatively affected early-stage innovation and clinical trials.

3. Global Partnerships and Trade

Trump's focus on “America First” and trade wars, particularly with China, disrupted cross-border biotech collaborations and access to foreign markets and supply chains.

4. R&D Reallocation

Biotech companies began to reallocate research budgets towards safer or more profitable portfolios, avoiding high-risk high-cost innovations that could fall prey to regulatory scrutiny.

Investor Sentiment and Risk Aversion

Under Trump, investor sentiment towards biotech turned cautious. The unpredictable political environment introduced a risk premium into biotech equities, leading analysts to downgrade stocks across the board.

Major Factors Behind Investor Pullback:

• Concerns over pricing regulations affecting profit margins.

• Delayed clinical trial approvals or sudden FDA rule changes.

• Lack of clarity on patent protections in foreign trade agreements.

Policy Instability vs Scientific Progress

Ironically, this policy turmoil came at a time when biotech science was progressing rapidly. Technologies like CRISPR-Cas9, mRNA vaccines, and artificial intelligence in drug discovery were redefining the future of medicine.

But without clear government support, scientific breakthroughs failed to translate into commercial successes. Policy paralysis discouraged long-term commitments to drug pipelines, thereby slowing the pace of medical innovation.

The Post-Trump Recovery

Following the 2020 U.S. elections, there was a noticeable rebound in biotech investor confidence under the Biden administration, which pledged transparency, science-first policymaking, and healthcare expansion.

Notable Recovery Trends:

• Increased FDA collaboration with biotech firms.

• Renewed focus on pandemic preparedness boosting vaccine research.

• Revival of global biotech conferences and partnerships.

Conclusion

The biotech industry’s slump under Trump serves as a cautionary tale about the role of government stability and regulatory predictability in driving innovation. While bold reforms are sometimes necessary, inconsistent and politically motivated policies can stifle even the most advanced technological sectors.

Moving forward, biotech stakeholders need to advocate for:

• Science-based regulatory reforms.

• Protection of intellectual property rights.

• Supportive public-private funding models.

• Transparency in drug pricing policy.

With these safeguards, the biotech sector can recover from past shocks and continue its mission of transforming lives through science.

A Deep Dive into ISRO’s Gaganyaan Mission

As the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) advances steadily towards launching its maiden human spaceflight mission — Gaganyaan — the emphasis on spaceflight safety has never been more crucial. India is on the brink of joining an elite group of nations capable of sending humans to space, and ISRO is leaving no stone unturned to ensure that every stage of the mission, from liftoff to landing, adheres to global safety standards.

Gaganyaan is poised to become a landmark achievement in India’s space exploration journey. It aims to send three astronauts into low Earth orbit (LEO) for up to seven days. While this initial mission is not intended to dock with any space station, the selected crew is being familiarized with docking procedures, a forward-thinking move that prepares them for potential future missions involving orbital rendezvous and space station docking.

Ensuring astronaut safety is a complex, multilayered process involving extensive planning, rigorous testing, and highly specialized training. One of the mission’s key safety mechanisms is the Crew Escape System (CES) — an emergency module designed to rapidly separate the crew module from the launch vehicle in case of any anomaly during ascent. This system uses solid-fuel rocket motors to propel the module to safety, thus providing a critical escape route in a matter of seconds. The launch abort system, as it's also known, has already undergone successful testing and is seen as a cornerstone of ISRO’s human-rating efforts.

Beyond launch, life in space presents its own set of challenges. The Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) aboard the Gaganyaan spacecraft plays a vital role in maintaining a habitable environment for the astronauts. It controls cabin pressure, manages oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, regulates temperature and humidity, and even handles waste. All of these systems must work flawlessly to keep the crew alive and healthy in the harsh environment of space. This integration of life support systems is key to ensuring human survivability beyond Earth.

ISRO has taken an extremely cautious approach by integrating redundant systems into both the spacecraft and the modified GSLV Mk III rocket, now termed HLVM3. These backups span everything from power supplies to navigation and communication systems, and are designed to take over seamlessly in case the primary systems fail. Redundancy in aerospace systems is a widely adopted principle among space agencies like NASA and ESA, and ISRO’s implementation of it showcases its growing sophistication in mission planning and execution.

To ensure the astronauts are fully prepared, ISRO has partnered with Russia’s Glavkosmos for astronaut training. Four Indian Air Force pilots have been undergoing a rigorous regimen that includes high-G simulations, underwater weightlessness training, and emergency procedures. Interestingly, despite no docking being planned for Gaganyaan, the astronauts are being trained in docking protocols — a forward-looking strategy that reflects ISRO’s aspirations for space station collaboration and long-duration missions in the future.

Before the final crewed mission, ISRO has planned a detailed series of tests. This includes Test Vehicle Abort Missions (TV-D1, TV-D2, etc.), which are designed to validate the functionality of the Crew Escape System under various failure scenarios. In addition, two uncrewed Gaganyaan missions will simulate the full mission profile, using instrumented humanoid robots to gather data on the spacecraft’s behavior in orbit and during re-entry. These uncrewed trials act as a critical buffer against unknowns and ensure that no aspect of the mission is left unverified.

The Gaganyaan spacecraft itself is a marvel of modern engineering. It consists of a Crew Module, which is pressurized and houses the astronauts, and a Service Module that contains support systems like propulsion and thermal regulation. The modules have undergone multiple tests, including thermal vacuum trials, vibration analysis, and drop tests to simulate landing conditions. Each component has been engineered to withstand the extreme stresses of launch and re-entry.

Another major innovation lies in the human-rating of the launch vehicle. The HLVM3 rocket, previously used for satellite launches, has undergone extensive modifications to make it suitable for carrying humans. These changes include enhanced structural integrity, improved vibration damping, and the integration of high-reliability avionics systems. These adaptations are in line with international human-rating standards, and their meticulous implementation reflects ISRO’s commitment to astronaut safety.

Safety doesn’t stop at the edge of Earth’s atmosphere. In space, threats like micro-meteorites, orbital debris, and radiation exposure can pose serious risks to both spacecraft and crew. Gaganyaan’s systems are designed to offer shielding and early warning protocols against such hazards. ISRO’s engineers have drawn from NASA’s MMOD protection strategies and are working with international agencies to design robust defenses.

Importantly, ISRO is not working in isolation. The organization has entered into multiple international collaborations with agencies like NASA, ESA, and Roscosmos to ensure that its systems and protocols meet global spaceflight safety standards. These partnerships involve sharing critical knowledge, aligning safety protocols, and co-developing technologies that improve mission success rates. The cross-pollination of expertise is not only vital for Gaganyaan’s success but also sets the stage for future joint missions.

Although Gaganyaan will not involve any docking maneuvers, the training in docking procedures is a strategic move, considering India's plans to build its own Indian space station by 2028. By preparing astronauts today for operations they will conduct years from now, ISRO is establishing a long-term vision for sustainable human presence in space.

In every aspect — from engineering to training to collaboration — ISRO’s focus on spaceflight safety is clear and commendable. Gaganyaan is not just a mission; it’s a stepping stone toward India's long-term goals in space, such as planetary exploration, space station development, and human missions to the Moon and beyond.

Test Your Knowledge: Gaganyaan Safety Quiz

1. What is the primary function of the Crew Escape System in Gaganyaan?

A) To increase thrust

B) To navigate in orbit

C) To evacuate the crew in case of launch failure

D) To assist in docking

✅ Correct Answer: C

2. Which organization is collaborating with ISRO for astronaut training?

A) NASA

B) JAXA

C) Glavkosmos

D) SpaceX

✅ Correct Answer: C

3. What is the target orbit for Gaganyaan's mission?

A) Medium Earth Orbit

B) Geostationary Orbit

C) Low Earth Orbit

D) High Earth Orbit

✅ Correct Answer: C

4. Which system ensures oxygen and temperature levels inside the crew module?

A) Crew Escape System

B) Environmental Control and Life Support System

C) Ground Control Monitoring

D) Propulsion Support Unit

✅ Correct Answer: B

Final Thoughts

The Gaganyaan mission is a bold stride into the future for India’s space ambitions. With meticulous attention to safety, cutting-edge technology, and an eye on international collaboration, ISRO is not just launching a rocket — it’s launching India into a new era of human spaceflight. Through this mission, India aims to inspire a new generation of scientists, engineers, and explorers who will shape the future of space travel.

CERN Unveils Plans for the Large Hadron Collider's Successor: The Future Circular Collider

CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, has revealed ambitious plans for a next-generation particle accelerator that will succeed the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). This new project, known as the Future Circular Collider (FCC), aims to push the boundaries of particle physics, offering deeper insights into the fundamental nature of the universe. With cutting-edge technology and unprecedented energy levels, the FCC could unlock answers to some of the most profound scientific mysteries.

What is the Future Circular Collider (FCC)?

The FCC is a proposed underground particle accelerator with a circumference of approximately 91 kilometers, significantly larger than the 27-kilometer LHC. The FCC will be built beneath the French-Swiss border and extend under Lake Geneva, offering a much more powerful platform for high-energy physics research.

Key Objectives of the FCC

• Explore dark matter and dark energy: Scientists aim to uncover the composition of the universe, which remains largely unknown.

• Investigate the Higgs boson: More precise measurements could provide deeper insights into the origin of mass.

• Study matter-antimatter asymmetry: Understanding why the universe is predominantly composed of matter rather than antimatter.

• Search for new particles: The FCC may detect phenomena beyond the Standard Model of particle physics.

Technical Details and Timeline

The FCC will be developed in two major phases:

1. FCC-ee (Electron-Positron Collider)

• Expected to begin operations in the mid-2040s.

• Focus on high-precision studies of known particles, particularly the Higgs boson.

• Utilize electron-positron collisions to analyze fundamental physics with minimal background noise.

2. FCC-hh (Hadron Collider)

• Planned for the 2070s.

• Will collide protons at 100 TeV (compared to the LHC's 13 TeV), significantly increasing collision energy.

• Could reveal new physics phenomena beyond the current Standard Model.

The estimated cost for the first phase (FCC-ee) is around 15 billion Swiss Francs, with a projected timeline of at least 15 years. The project is expected to generate approximately 800,000 person-years of employment, highlighting its economic impact.

Potential Scientific Breakthroughs

The FCC could revolutionize our understanding of the universe by addressing some of the biggest unanswered questions:

1. What is Dark Matter and Dark Energy?

While dark matter and dark energy make up about 95% of the universe, their true nature remains elusive. The FCC could provide the necessary energy and data to help identify these mysterious components.

2. What Lies Beyond the Standard Model?

Physicists believe the Standard Model is incomplete. The FCC will have the power to test new theories, including supersymmetry and extra dimensions.

3. Why is There More Matter Than Antimatter?

One of the greatest puzzles in physics is why the universe is made mostly of matter when the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter. The FCC could help uncover the missing piece of this puzzle.

Controversies and Challenges

The FCC proposal has sparked both excitement and debate among scientists and policymakers.

Arguments in Favor

• Scientific Advancements: The FCC represents the next logical step in particle physics.

• Economic and Technological Benefits: Past investments in particle physics have led to innovations in medicine, computing, and engineering.

• Global Collaboration: Large-scale scientific projects bring together international researchers, fostering cooperation and knowledge sharing.

Criticisms and Concerns

• High Costs: With an estimated multi-billion-dollar price tag, some argue the funds could be allocated to other pressing global issues, such as climate change.

• Technical Challenges: Constructing such a massive infrastructure poses significant engineering and logistical difficulties.

• Environmental Impact: The energy demands of the FCC raise questions about sustainability and its long-term effects on the environment.

New Leadership at CERN and Its Impact

The appointment of Professor Mark Thomson as CERN’s Director-General in 2026 is expected to shape the future of the FCC. With extensive experience in particle physics, Thomson will oversee strategic planning, funding negotiations, and global partnerships to ensure the project's success.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: How is the FCC different from the LHC?

A: The FCC will operate at significantly higher energy levels, allowing it to explore new physics beyond the LHC's capabilities. Its larger circumference will enable more precise measurements and discoveries.

Q: Will the FCC impact the environment?

A: CERN is conducting environmental assessments to minimize any negative effects. Plans include energy efficiency measures and sustainability initiatives to offset its carbon footprint.

Q: When will the FCC be approved and built?

A: CERN's member states are expected to decide on the project’s approval by 2028. If approved, construction would begin in the 2030s, with the FCC-ee operational by the mid-2040s.

Conclusion

The Future Circular Collider is an ambitious step forward in the quest to understand the universe. While challenges remain, its potential to unlock groundbreaking discoveries makes it one of the most exciting scientific endeavors of the 21st century. As CERN and the global scientific community move forward, the FCC represents the next frontier in particle physics, promising to redefine our understanding of reality itself.

SpaceX Fram2 Mission: First Human Spaceflight to Polar Orbit

On April 1, 2025, SpaceX launched the Fram2 mission, marking the first-ever human spaceflight to polar orbit. This historic mission aims to conduct groundbreaking research, including the first X-ray imaging in space and experiments on human health in microgravity. The mission represents a giant leap in human space exploration, opening doors to future deep-space travel and scientific discoveries.

The Significance of Fram2

Fram2 is a privately funded spaceflight that distinguishes itself by taking a unique trajectory over Earth's poles. Unlike traditional equatorial orbits, this mission provides a rare opportunity to observe Earth's polar regions from space, offering new insights into climate science, atmospheric phenomena, and radiation exposure in different parts of the orbit.

Key Objectives of the Fram2 Mission

• First human spaceflight to polar orbit

• Conduct first-ever X-ray imaging in space

• Perform microgravity experiments on human health

• Study biological growth, including fungi and plants, in space

• Capture high-resolution imagery of Earth's polar regions

The Crew and Their Mission

The Fram2 mission is led by a diverse and highly skilled team of astronauts:

• Chun Wang (Mission Commander) – Entrepreneur and mission financier

• Jannicke Mikkelsen (Vehicle Commander) – Renowned cinematographer

• Rabea Rogge (Pilot) – German roboticist specializing in AI applications

• Eric Philips (Medical Officer) – Australian polar explorer and space health researcher

Together, they will conduct a total of 22 scientific experiments during their time in space, gathering valuable data on space physiology, astrophysics, and biological sciences.

Scientific Breakthroughs: What Makes Fram2 Special?

First X-ray Imaging in Space

One of the most anticipated aspects of the Fram2 mission is the first-ever X-ray imaging conducted in space. This experiment will help scientists observe cosmic X-ray sources with unprecedented clarity and contribute to a deeper understanding of black holes, neutron stars, and high-energy astrophysical phenomena.

Human Health Studies in Microgravity

With long-term space travel on the horizon, understanding how the human body adapts to microgravity is crucial. The crew will study muscle atrophy, bone density loss, and cardiovascular changes to inform future missions, particularly those to Mars and beyond.

Biological Growth in Space

The Fram2 crew will attempt to grow mushrooms in space, an experiment with significant implications for sustainable food production during long-duration missions. This research may also help understand fungal adaptations to extreme environments, potentially leading to biotechnological advancements on Earth.

Engineering Feats and Challenges

Polar Orbit: A Unique Pathway

Entering a polar orbit presents new challenges compared to traditional orbits. Due to the trajectory, the spacecraft experiences more exposure to cosmic radiation, requiring enhanced shielding and careful mission planning. However, this orbit also offers unique opportunities for research, particularly in atmospheric science and climate monitoring.

Reusability and Cost Efficiency

Fram2 utilizes the Crew Dragon capsule "Resilience," making its fourth flight, demonstrating SpaceX’s advancements in reusable spaceflight technology. The mission's success underscores the feasibility of frequent and cost-effective human spaceflights beyond the International Space Station (ISS).

Stunning Visuals: Documenting Earth's Polar Regions

For the first time, astronauts have captured high-resolution images and videos of Earth's polar regions from space. These breathtaking visuals will not only provide scientific value but also raise awareness about climate change and environmental conservation.

Addressing Health and Safety Challenges

One of the major concerns of the Fram2 mission is radiation exposure. The Translational Research Institute for Space Health (TRISH) is monitoring the crew's radiation levels to develop better shielding and protective strategies for future deep-space travel.

Future Implications: Paving the Way for Deep-Space Missions

The Fram2 mission serves as a critical stepping stone toward more ambitious endeavors, such as missions to Mars and long-term lunar habitats. The scientific data collected will inform the design of future spacecraft, life-support systems, and astronaut health protocols.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Why is the Fram2 mission important?

A: It is the first human spaceflight to polar orbit and includes groundbreaking scientific experiments, advancing our understanding of space travel and astrophysics.

Q: How does a polar orbit differ from traditional orbits?

A: Unlike equatorial orbits, a polar orbit passes over both the North and South Poles, allowing for comprehensive global observations and unique research opportunities.

Q: What are the potential benefits of X-ray imaging in space?

A: Space-based X-ray imaging can provide clearer observations of high-energy celestial objects, aiding in the study of black holes, neutron stars, and space radiation.

Q: How does the mission impact future space travel?

A: The experiments conducted will help refine astronaut health protocols, improve spacecraft design, and support future interplanetary missions.

Conclusion

The SpaceX Fram2 mission is a monumental step in human spaceflight history, combining cutting-edge science, engineering prowess, and a bold vision for the future. As humanity ventures deeper into space, missions like Fram2 will continue to pave the way, bringing us closer to understanding the universe and preparing for life beyond Earth.

India Must Be a Reliable Trade Partner to Compete in the EV Space

The global electric vehicle (EV) industry is expanding at a rapid pace, driven by advancements in battery technology, sustainability goals, and government incentives. India, with its ambitious vision for an EV revolution, has the potential to become a key player in this dynamic market. However, to establish itself as a trusted and competitive EV manufacturing hub, India must strengthen its supply chain, trade partnerships, and policy frameworks.

India’s Growing EV Market: A Promising Landscape

India is witnessing a surge in EV adoption, fueled by factors such as:

• The Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles (FAME) initiative

• Increasing investment in EV infrastructure

• A strong push for local battery production to reduce dependency on imports

• Rising consumer interest in sustainable mobility

Despite these advancements, India's ability to compete on a global scale depends on its reliability as a trade partner and supply chain integrator.

Challenges Hindering India’s EV Trade Competitiveness

1. Dependence on Imports for Critical EV Components

• India imports a significant portion of its lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, and rare earth metals.

• A lack of domestic production capacity creates supply chain bottlenecks.

2. Need for Robust Trade Agreements

• Unlike China and the EU, India lags in strategic trade alliances for securing raw materials.

• Bilateral trade agreements with lithium-rich nations like Australia and Chile are crucial.

3. Infrastructure and Charging Network Gaps

• The limited availability of fast-charging stations slows down EV adoption.

• Investments in smart grids and renewable energy-powered charging stations are needed.

4. Policy Uncertainty and Regulatory Hurdles

• Frequent changes in EV subsidies and taxation policies create uncertainty for global investors.

• Streamlined policies and consistent incentives are necessary to attract long-term investments.

Strategies to Strengthen India’s Position in the EV Supply Chain

1. Strengthening Domestic EV Manufacturing

• PLI (Production-Linked Incentive) schemes should be expanded to cover EV batteries, power electronics, and charging stations.

• Focus on indigenous research and development for battery technology alternatives like solid-state and sodium-ion batteries.

2. Building Global Trade Partnerships

• India must negotiate free trade agreements (FTAs) with key EV players in Asia, Europe, and North America.

• Strengthening ties with battery raw material suppliers can ensure a stable and cost-effective supply chain.

3. Investing in Green Infrastructure

• Development of a nationwide EV charging network integrated with renewable energy sources.

• Promotion of battery recycling and second-life applications to reduce dependency on imports.

4. Stable Policy Framework and Incentives

• A long-term, consistent EV policy roadmap to boost investor confidence.

• Expansion of tax benefits and subsidies for EV manufacturers and consumers.

India’s Path to Becoming a Global EV Leader

For India to emerge as a reliable trade partner in the EV sector, it must address its supply chain vulnerabilities, trade dependencies, and infrastructure gaps. By fostering global collaborations, investing in green technology, and implementing stable policies, India can position itself as a leading EV exporter while achieving its vision for a sustainable mobility revolution.

---

Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs)

1. What is a key factor hindering India’s competitiveness in the EV market?

A) Excessive domestic battery production

B) Lack of raw material trade agreements

C) Oversupply of semiconductor chips

D) Decreasing EV demand globally

Answer: B) Lack of raw material trade agreements

2. Why is strengthening trade partnerships important for India’s EV sector?

A) To increase domestic fuel consumption

B) To reduce dependence on critical component imports

C) To limit global competition

D) To discourage foreign investments in EVs

Answer: B) To reduce dependence on critical component imports

3. What role does the PLI scheme play in India’s EV sector?

A) Encourages domestic manufacturing of EV components

B) Reduces EV adoption through high taxation

C) Increases dependence on foreign manufacturers

D) Limits R&D investments in battery technology

Answer: A) Encourages domestic manufacturing of EV components

4. Which policy initiative aims to boost EV adoption in India?

A) FAME (Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles)

B) Startup India Program

C) Ayushman Bharat Scheme

D) Swachh Bharat Abhiyan

Answer: A) FAME (Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles)

5. What is one major challenge in India’s EV infrastructure?

A) Excessive availability of charging stations

B) Limited fast-charging network

C) Oversupply of EVs in the market

D) Low electricity generation capacity

Answer: B) Limited fast-charging network